Re: What's your opinion on using alternatives for mesa-libGL(U)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stewart Adam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm wondering what you're opinions/arguments for or against using
> alternatives to symlink the libraries of mesa-libGL and mesa-libGLU.

I think changing anything in regard to libraries should only be done for 'good
reason' and with MAJOR PR to make sure people know.  The symlink plan has been
working fine for a long time, with massive amounts of help forums, faqs, etc,
out there for people.  The proprietary ati/nvidia drivers currently install that
way, and the packaged versions others have done (livna) are the same.

-- 
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> <ajfarris@xxxxxxxxx>
   gpg 0xC99B1DF3 at pgp.mit.edu

No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux