On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:15:15PM +0100, Martin Stransky wrote: > P.S.: ISC is quite paranoid about releasing "stable" versions bacause it > has customers who pay for ISC software and use it in critical environment. > So in this case I think we can be quite relaxed. But doesn't ISC also need a period of releases where they can go hog wild with changes, new features, etc. and not worry about stability as much? Isn't that period of time usually called "Alpha"? It's like Rawhide--the software in there may be stable, but it doesn't have to be, and often isn't at the beginning of a new release cycle. It's all about perception. I wouldn't put Rawhide on my production servers, and I don't expect something that upstream calls "Alpha" to be on my production servers either. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
