Re: alpha/beta software in Fedora 8?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:30:10AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > Really? Are our users clamoring for features *in bind* so much that we
> > > should push an *alpha* version to released updates?
> > 
> > Uhm i dont think this started with the latest update... i think the
> > version released in f8 was also a pre-release.
> 
> I stand correct. I still don't feel it's appropriate for a released
> tree when in the alpha state - after all, the current supported release
> of bind was made in July - that's not that long ago.
> 
> Bill

As I wrote above I disagree with you that put alpha (which will come
to beta really soon) to F8 is bad decision "because it is alpha". I
tested it and I didn't find any issues. That's why I decided put 9.5
to F8.

Adam

> 
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux