Re: Maintainers Responsibility (was alpha/beta software in Fedora 8)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:31:11AM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> 
> 
> The importance of individual packages is pretty dependent on the use
> case. For most users of a Fedora desktop, it is probably far more
> disastrous if the email client or web browser crashes, than if some dns
> server the haven't installed has some bugs.
> 

Without DNS server noone who uses it could browse pages or fetch mails
(or you know IP of your mailserver?) :) I agree that We have to update
server packages more carefully than desktop applications.

Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux