On 24.11.2007 10:46, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Panu Matilainen wrote: >>> The ugly part is that it makes parsing harder as you have to account for >>> the possibility of epoch being or not being there always, but OTOH you can >>> always pick your own queryformat if you don't want to deal with it. >> Can't you unconditionally have a epoch number listed all the time? 0 if there >> is no epoch for that package. > Obviously you CAN, but do you REALLY want to? While at discussing rpm's default queryformat -- should we get the information where a packages comes from integrated *somewhere* (maybe no "rpm -q") in the output from rpm or yum as well to finally solve the old "repotags are useful" vs. "repotags are evil" debate? CU knurd -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
