Re: Heads up: openldap rebase for Fedora/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:52:30 +0100, Jan Safranek wrote:

> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:59:12 +0100, Jan Safranek wrote:
> > 
> >> Appendix: list of packages, depending on openldap:
> > 
> > This list is very incomplete.  How did you create it?
> 
> (
>    repoquery --whatrequires openldap;
>    repoquery --whatrequires libldap_r-2.3.so.0;
>    repoquery --whatrequires libldap-2.3.so.0;
>    repoquery --whatrequires liblber-2.3.so.0
> ) | sed 's/-[0-9].*//' | sort | uniq
> 
> Now I see I created it on Fedora 7 instead rawhide, sorry.

Whether F7, F8 or rawhide, shouldn't matter. The differences
aren't that huge. Even the sonames are the same on F7.

> Does following list sound better?

Yes, thrice as long and looks much more plausible.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux