Ville Skyttä (ville.skytta@xxxxxx) said: > >From my POV in this particular case, I'd be inclined to let em8300 (the > non-kmod package) stay in Fedora because of the above, and also because it's > actually possible that the em8300 modules get beaten into a shape where they > can be included in upstream or Fedora kernels by F9 or F10 time. Don't we have vserver-using packages in Fedora that can't work without rebuilding the kernel? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
