On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 20:46 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >From my POV in this particular case, I'd be inclined to let em8300 (the > non-kmod package) stay in Fedora because of the above, and also because it's > actually possible that the em8300 modules get beaten into a shape where they > can be included in upstream or Fedora kernels by F9 or F10 time. This sounds very reasonable to me, FWIW. Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
