On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 10:33 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 7:49 AM, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > For my tools (-date, -nfs, -samba, -services, -users), just being able
> > to edit files is also not sufficient. Often these tools don't edit files
> > themselves but use e.g. chkconfig or libuser, partly it isn't even known
> > whether local files are changed or some objects in an LDAP directory.
>
> Well I was considering that the doCommand, doCommandWait to take care
> of that. Am I underestimating that need?
That would work for chkconfig, but not libuser. I won't resort to
calling luser{add,mod,del} ;-).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
