Re: System-config Reworking Proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Nov 19, 2007 7:49 AM, Nils Philippsen <nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For my tools (-date, -nfs, -samba, -services, -users), just being able
> to edit files is also not sufficient. Often these tools don't edit files
> themselves but use e.g. chkconfig or libuser, partly it isn't even known
> whether local files are changed or some objects in an LDAP directory.

Well I was considering that the doCommand, doCommandWait to take care
of that. Am I underestimating that need?

> In my eyes, we first need to get UI, logic and privileged operations
> cleanly separated. Then we can think about additional stuff like logging
> of operations (would be put between UI and logic) or move stuff from
> using usermode to PolicyKit.

Seems like something that can be in parallel as part of the reworking.

-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux