On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 00:08 +0900, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > Hey all, > > Just wanted your thoughts on something relating to documentation. I had a > read of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-daa717ea096fa4d9cf7b9a49b5edb36e3bda3aac > relating specifically to the documentation aspect. Basically I was > looking at packaging Diveintopython. > > http://www.diveintopython.org/index.html > > There is no clear guideline except for will it improve the user > experience. To me thats fairly ambiguous as to what is considered > improving the user experience. It's probably worded that way specifically > for a reason to not limit what goes in. The guidelines specifically state in the examples following that documentation is permissible. I thought about packaging this myself and never got around to it. If you decide to do this, let me know. If you decide *not* to do this, please also let me know. :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
