On Nov 16, 2007 7:26 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:16:57 +0100 > "Valent Turkovic" <valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > /rant/ > > Why doesn't redhat or fedora buy one set of codecs so you can test > > them yourself? I don't get it... I don't mind helping but it is beyond > > my logic that fedora 8 claims that has fluendo codecs working with > > fedora 8 but nobody has actually used the codecs to confirm it :) > > /end rant/ > > We claim to be able to direct you at legal places that offer codecs for > download, and /they/ claim it works on Fedora 8. We're not doing > continued integration testing with their codecs, we're just continuing > to make and improve Fedora releases. It's unfortunate that their > offerings didn't work, that certainly puts them in a bad light. I was always wondered about such problem. I have seen several proprietary apps fail to run on selinux enforcing mode. Is it possible for a third party to install a supplementary package to fix/modify the selinux policy file so that their apps work? some thing like the conf.d in apache or yum.repo.d in yum that those apps throw their configuration file on install time and remove it when it is uninstall ed very easily? /yonas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list