On 11/15/2007 06:24 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.11.2007 12:41, Christopher Aillon wrote:
Then we should consider updating our guidelines. This brings up a good
point, too. If a given package guideline exists to work around bugs
like this in the future, the guideline really must reference the bug #
so it can be easier to revisit at a future date.
Agreed, albeit I'm not sure if the exact bug # is needed -- the
information "need in FC > foo and RHEL > bar" is the important one. And
maintaining that properly is more important due to EPEL, as we'll still
have to deal with EPEL for EL4 for some years.
Well for bugs that aren't yet fixed, we need the number. And a
reference to the guideline from the bug.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
