On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 07:50:54AM -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 7:01 AM, Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > - once you rpm -e --nodeps it, you find out that the "network" service > > is not on by default either (liveCD install) > > Perhaps we need to either make it even more clear what the usage case > for the desktop livecd actually is. I thought it was clear. Or > perhaps there is a compelling need for a server livecd that uses the > legacy network stack by default. Well, I would never have guessed that static IPs required specific massaging and legacy network support. Especially since it's a very visible option of the installer in a mandatory dialog window. At least if a message was added saying "any changes to this network dialog will be ignored", you could get some free advertising on the Daily WTF. > Either way, the desktop livecd we > are offering for F8 isn't intended to be the basis for situations for > all networking scenarios. That is why we continue to include the > legacy network stack and why the legacy network stack is used by > default on the traditional dvd install. > > I'm sort of confused by your statements concerning the inability to > turn NetworkManager off without having to remove the rpm. I can only say I must have been confused too. I looked for it in chkconfig --list and managed to miss it. Having it in chkconfig is infinitely more sane. My blood pressure just reduced by an order of magnitude. > In any event you should be able to turn off the NetworkManager > initscript and enable the legacy network initscript if its not already > running. None of this sysadmin activity requires uninstalling rpms. Yup. Having the standard install ignore and ever partially destroy configurations the installer itself proposed to set is plain rude though. > -jef"Spends quite a large amount of time in buildings containing rooms > that could be called 'labs' where most of the computers are immobile > and yet the network admins use a consistent dhcp scheme with mac > addressing to register each and every computer on the network unless > there is a demonstrated need for a static ip in which case you can > request one. NetworkManager works just fine for 'lab' workstations > here."spaleta What's the point, though, unless you're in a setup where 90%+ of the computers change every year[1]? OG. [1] Known as "University" among other possibilities -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list