Re: Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 23:41 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:

> 
> No the crux of my complaint is there is no way to get packages past the freeze 
> (not the last hard one, but the earlier one) without having to go the human ( = 
> slow, cumbersome) interaction path.

I have done a fair amount of bug-fixing during the freezes and asked for
them to be let through, and while it is a little bit of overhead to
write a three-line email that explains what bug I fixed, what the nature
of the fix is and that I believe it is harmless and worthwhile, I cannot
agree that the process is overly bureaucratic or cumbersome. 

The manual process of writing down a short note why your build should
get in despite the freeze achieves exactly what it is intended to
achieve: it slows down the churn in the tree.

If we just make this a self-service, use-your-best-judgment make
target, people will always err on the side of getting their stuff in.

Matthias  

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux