On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:44 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "CA" == Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > CA> Then we can leave that part out. There's a lot we can and should > CA> automate. > > [...] > > Actually all of the relevant tests should get into rpmlint, and then > we can just run rpmlint. rpmlint probably shouldn't be doing the "build in mock" test at least, but I think you have the right idea in that if we have these kinds of tests, it makes sense to have them as part of a continuous process (i.e. run them every time spec changes) rather than just the first time we add some software. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
