On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:49:43 +0100 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe I should have asked first that basic question, but is it > meaningful to have a fedora install that is not meant to be booted, > but maybe in a chroot? If it is to be booted, I have a fairly good > idea on what could be needed among the regular packages (sysvinit as > init, bash as a shell, initiscripts as an init system and so on and > so forth) and I guess that the Core comps group is about that. Now > something that get booted but uses 'absurd replacements' is another > issue, but it is not an issue that bothers me today (it may on > another day, though ;-). You'll notice that kernel isn't in the core group. Kernel is something that gets decided upon during install, so if you're just doing a chroot install, no kernel. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
