On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:09 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:02:12AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:26:40 +0100 > > Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I guess that there is a comps group for base system (I checked, it is > > > the Core group), but one should not think along this comps group, but > > > along a user who would want to do the minimal install (certainly in a > > > chroot). > > > > > > Has anybody done something similar? > > > > Why wouldn't you think comps group? yum --install-root=/path/to/chroot > > groupinstall 'Core' > > Because I was asking about the really minimal package set. The idea is > to have an idea of what packages should be installed, whatever comps > groups are. Core is still a big package set. If you really want to stick > on comps, the question could be what would be most reduced comps group? > Would there even be glibc, sysvinit.... see my post in it? You'd need a libc, some sort of init. It should be rather straightforward, testing in a chroot, to figure out the smallest set of Fedora packages that you can have and be functional (say, define functional as a working network, text editor, and shell). You can call it 'Masochist'. ;) ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
