Re: Random question about Koji's reporting of completion date vs. finished date

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 15:33 -0500, jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:38:13AM -0500, Oisin Feeley wrote:
> > > Uh, the build you linked to in [1] has a date of:       Fri, 21 Sep
> > > 2007 01:19:30 MST
> > >
> > > And the list you linked to in [2] has an entry for
> > > nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-3.fc8 that has a date of 2007-09-21 01:19:30
> > >
> > > How are these not the same dates?
> > 
> > Doh!  Sorry, I just read them incorrectly.  Apologies for the noise.
> > 
> > Oisin
> > 
> 
> why aren't the dates presented in the same format for the two fields? or am
> I missing something?

That's intentional.  The list view uses a more compact format so you can
squeeze more information into the same screen area.


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux