Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray (debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx) said: > I am afraid you got me wrong here. I did not use the term "compatible" > to mean license compatibility. I wanted to know whether an application > which dlopens libssl.so.0.9.8 could safely use libssl.so.0.9.8b > instead, without causing any API/ABI breakage? 'Not necessarily'. It's why the soname changes. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
