> To push any license violations on to the user instead of the distributor? > Cute. Why not just add an exception to your license? I am afraid you got me wrong here. I did not use the term "compatible" to mean license compatibility. I wanted to know whether an application which dlopens libssl.so.0.9.8 could safely use libssl.so.0.9.8b instead, without causing any API/ABI breakage? Sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
