On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:12:43 +0100 Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I personally, as a packager, do not care whether we stay with CVS or > move to another "more better" system. My packaging work flow for the > most part is satisifed with CVS. But also keep in mind that much of > the current package workflow has been defined by the limitations of > CVS. Our current faux-branching scheme was in part done because of > CVS, for example. I don't disagree at all, and I completely agree with the rest of your message, which is why I'm so interested in what kind of new and amazing workflow we might be able to find with a new VCS. The same workflow with a different VCS might gain you a few little nice things here and there, not used by most people. But if we can create a more compelling workflow with better tools, then that's really something to talk about. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
