Re: Codec Buddy misleading.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:56:57AM +0000, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> > > But I can accuse you of that whenever I like whether its true or not. So its
> > > irrelevant to the discussion, its a totally specious argument.
> > 
> > In any normal case, the accuser has to prove your guilt.
> 
> In a civil dispute its balance of probability
> 
> > But as far as I have understood about patents, you have to prove your
> > innocence.
> 
> In the US maybe. In other countries it is more complicated. In particular
> in many of these countries you wouldn't contest the patent you would cite
> the caselaw on patentability of software and business methods.
> 
> > I don't think it's an irrelevant or totally specious argument.
> 
> For europe I think it is. It doesn't help for the Red Hat case because
> as a US company Red Hat is obliged to obey US law.

Okay, thanks for your insight :)

Rui

-- 
P'tang!
Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 22nd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux