On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 09:31 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > I have to say that since we switched to mercurial we haven't looked > back. We are finding advantages to distributed VCS even though our > workflow model is basically centralized. > > For purposes of centralized workflow, the main change is that > centralized processing is triggered by "push" rather than by "commit". > With this exception, the workflow is basically unchanged relative to > other centralized workflows. Right things are different, that's all. > What hg is buying us is the following: [..] > > I'm not pushing for any change. I'm just trying to answer the workflow > question. Where in Fedora's package development would you see niches to apply these aspects? I don't see any. Finally, being a long term CVS user, would has very mixed experiences wrt. SVN, and who has recently been confronted with both git and mercurial, I can't deny finding both git and hg as not to be suitable for centralized development. They don't really buy much. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
