On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:05:58 -0800 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:38:41 +0100 > > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Mi November 7 2007, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > >>> Replacing a VCS for the fun of it is pretty pointless. Can you > >>> elaborate on a workflow you would like to see that CVS is not suited > >>> to? Right now, CVS works fine for what we do, which is mostly editing > >>> spec files. > >> "cvs diff" makes afaik a network connection, which makes it very slow compared > >> to a modern vcs. Also tagging / commit takes very long imho, but maybe this > >> is because of all the hook scripts. Afaik, there is nothing than one can do > >> about it as a maintainer to speed this up. > > > > You're going to come across that in any centralized type workflow. > > Which, ultimately, is exactly what Fedora is. > > > ...for tagging/commit. > > diff can be done without a network connection every single time even > with centralized management. Yes, true. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
