> Well, there is already a package and a review; it would be enough to > revive it/take it over. That is what I meant. :-) > Since I am not sure that glade3 is actually a drop-in replacement for > glade2 I would say that it should be glade3 and should not conflict with > or obsolete glade2. But I haven't investigated this closely. Ok. Thanks, Debarshi -- GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7 Key server: pgp.mit.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
