On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 22:19 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220710 > > > > These review requests seem abandoned. > > > > Would it be alright if I picked up the Specs and SRPMs, polished them > > up a bit and submitted a review request? > > > > Glade3 has been incorperated into gtk-2.12.0, and thus will be in F-8, its > called gtkbuilder now and this is considered the future of glade (AFAIK) > This is so inaccurate that one could call it wrong. gtk 2.12 does contain GtkBuilder, which is a piece of code very similar in functionality to libglade, which it will obsolete over time. The file format used by GtkBuilder is different from the glade file format, and we hope that ui builders will soon start to support the GtkBuilder format in addition to the glade format. GtkBuilder is in no way a replacement for glade, gazpacho or glade-3 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
