Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"AJ" == Adam Jackson <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
AJ> Openchrome appears to be a complete superset of the existing via
AJ> driver, which is unmaintained and in some cases actively broken.
AJ> So I have no problem with openchrome actively claiming devices.
yes, openchrome is based on what used to be the via xorg driver.
So then should the existing via driver stop claiming them? Otherwise
don't we start running into unspecified behavior when multiple .xinf
files claim a device?
- J<
My understanding is openchrome will only claim a device if it's manually
installed (obviously), and if the user invokes system-config-display
again after that. Does this make sense ?
Regards,
Xavier
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
