>>>>> "AJ" == Adam Jackson <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: AJ> Openchrome appears to be a complete superset of the existing via AJ> driver, which is unmaintained and in some cases actively broken. AJ> So I have no problem with openchrome actively claiming devices. So then should the existing via driver stop claiming them? Otherwise don't we start running into unspecified behavior when multiple .xinf files claim a device? - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
