Re: rawhide report: 20071030 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:37:00 +0100
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote:

And again I see a lot of fix multilib conflicts changelog entries,
wasn't this supposed to be F-9 material and if they are how does this
relate to the freeze?

I've fixed quite a few packages for this too, but all the bug reports
I got said it would be nice if this were to be fixed for F-9.

Some overachieving maintainers requested that these be fixed in F-8,
particularly if it would effect yum upgrades from F7 or otherwise part
of a standard package set.  Since we were taking in bugfixes we went
ahead and accepted these requests for inclusion.  However as per my
email just a moment ago today is the last day for such freedom in
requesting bugfixes.  Even today I'm going to give people a harder time
on getting stuff in.


For those following along at home... which "scheduled milestone" reflects the "last day of freedom"? I don't see anything for October 30th here
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/8/Schedule

John

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux