On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:37:00 +0100 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote: > And again I see a lot of fix multilib conflicts changelog entries, > wasn't this supposed to be F-9 material and if they are how does this > relate to the freeze? > > I've fixed quite a few packages for this too, but all the bug reports > I got said it would be nice if this were to be fixed for F-9. Some overachieving maintainers requested that these be fixed in F-8, particularly if it would effect yum upgrades from F7 or otherwise part of a standard package set. Since we were taking in bugfixes we went ahead and accepted these requests for inclusion. However as per my email just a moment ago today is the last day for such freedom in requesting bugfixes. Even today I'm going to give people a harder time on getting stuff in. The bugs say F9 because it was completely unreasonable to expect everybody fix this stuff for F8 (and that would be a lot of churn very late in the game). So the deadline is F9. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
