Re: catching broken deps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> Because of the way we do multilib generation a very long process is
> involved to re-determine with the new package set exactly what is
> multilib and if this new determination would bring in anything new
> and/or lead to broken deps.

But wouldn't an approximation which ignores multilib, such as doing the checks 
only on non-multilib arches or even only on a single non-multilib arch (i.e. 
i386), be better than no checks at all?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux