On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:29:06 +0200 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> wrote: > I'm much in favor of more automated checks like this too. I would > even like to see them because build failures, were the packager gets > some method to override them (for example a list of regular > expressions of rpmlint messages which should be ignored by this > check). > > Jesse, > > Could you explain why this won't work with mutlilib? Because of the way we do multilib generation a very long process is involved to re-determine with the new package set exactly what is multilib and if this new determination would bring in anything new and/or lead to broken deps. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
