On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Yes it absolutely sucks for the user who has these optional components > installed. Because that user is now required to make a choice. You > can choose to uninstall the packages which have a dep problem or you > can choose to ignore that update because it causes dep problems. > Something like the yum-skip-broken plugin package helps users make a > choice, by choosing to not install the update because of the dep > problems. I'm not aware of a similar yum plugin which forces the > install of security updates, but perhaps such a plugin should exist to > round out the policy choices for end-users. > I tried the skip-broken plugin to resolve this problem but it failed to, um, skip the broken packages. Can't find it as a component in bugzilla. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
