On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:16:44 -0400 Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Isn't this codified though, rather than through a package list > containing fully qualified packages with arches? It's in RPM to prefer the 32bit elf file over the 64bit elf file. And at compose time we treat ppc64 as the "secondary arch" so there are less ppc64 packages than ppc32. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
