Richard W.M. Jones (rjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Aha. Is there any flag or setting to change this? No. > Also it still seems to report conflicts with the ELF binaries. If you want > to take a look at some they are in the links below. They look like > perfectly ordinary ELF binaries to my untrained eye ... > > http://annexia.org/tmp/camlp4oof.opt.i386 > http://annexia.org/tmp/camlp4oof.opt.x86-64 > > $ file */usr/bin/camlp4oof.opt > i386/usr/bin/camlp4oof.opt: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, > version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux > 2.6.9, stripped > x86_64/usr/bin/camlp4oof.opt: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 > (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, > stripped Can you file a RPM bug on this? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
