Richard W.M. Jones (rjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> The ocamlrun scripts also look like binary (arch dependent?) stuff >> so it is a logical that there is conflict. It certainly requires >> something to be done at the rpm level, but I am far from being an expert >> on those issues. > > The files which begin with #!/usr/bin/ocamlrun are bytecode files. Even > though it's called "bytecode" it isn't portable between architectures. It's > not like Java bytecode. So consider these to be like binaries too. rpm only handles resolving conflicts between 32 and 64-bit ELF files - anything else is displayed to the user as a conflict. These bytecode files would fall into that category. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
