Le mardi 23 octobre 2007 à 00:39 -0400, Owen Taylor a écrit : > I've now commented in great detail on the bug explaining a few of the > reasons why I chose to hardcode 96dpi years ago. And you know I disagreed then, and other distributions opened high priority bugs to reverse your hack. (mandrake then, ubuntu and sus today). > The situation has changed a bit More than a bit, the high dpi screens you've alway said would never happen did happen (olpc and openmoko are examples). > (and there would be an argument to up the 96dpi to > something higher), but most of the arguments against using the reported > monitor DPI as the logical font DPI still hold. As much as before that is not at all. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
