On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 10:22 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:15:03 -0400 > Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Right. And here again is one of the major problems. We know what the > > problem is, and Fedora has a record of being able to push through > > changes once a problem is identified and time thrown at it - why can't > > there just be a cut-off date/release by which most of the packages > > must have been split out? Then multilib *hacks* can be thrown away. > > Because while this is a "fix" for our current multilib algorithms, it's > not clear that this is a proper fix in whole. It is another bandaid > for the bleeding wound we have. It's not trivial to go splitting a > crapton of packages, so perhaps we'd like some more idea of "this is > The Fix". I guess I'm throwing things out there to say "we need to decide what the real fix is this time" - can we get a few of us together, and (virtually) sit down and reason through the options? Jesse - ideas on how to organize this effort? Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
