Mike McGrath wrote: > I think the reason was just that the x86_64 install with multilib was > not CD sized anymore. At least not for one CD with a 'minimal' > install. Perhaps we should put a bounty out there for a single CD > x86_64 install and see if anyone can do it :) Ah, so it is pkgorder... (with regards to getting a base that is multilib to fit in ~700MB) ;-) So the problem is our "Base" group? Aka, we need to spend time on our comps to list much more as optional? I suppose this also would affect the x86 spin, making the "Base" install much smaller and thus not utilizing the available 700MB? Is this a bad thing? (proposing modifications to our groups definitions to bring multilib inline, however, having the side-effect of reducing the package payload for a "base" x86 install) Jonathan Steffan daMaestro -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
