Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
I'm not misunderstanding the concept of a LiveCD in any way, I'm
just disagreeing about how important having CD media released by the
Fedora Project is exactly.
So, not releasing CD sets is like saying you need to yum upgrade
although it is not recommended just because someone out there isn't
using the LiveCD installer because they tried Fedora and felt
comfortable. Someone is actually needing CD sets, and based on the
numbers that has been at least 760 people in the last 4 weeks.
I think the better solution is to support live upgrades better and
don't do multi arch in live images by default so that they fit into a
CD for all architectures.
Rahul
If only we could fulfill todays needs with whatever the future promises.
The need is actually for the next release. There is no reason reason we
couldn't do put more effort into what I had just outlined now onwards
for the next development cycle. We could release Fedora 8 live images
and when we release Fedora 9, we make live upgrades a supported option.
That would solve the actual problem instead of working around it.
Rahul
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding you but I don't think you can call
what we had with FC6 and lost with F7 "a work around" for a problem that
we've introduced with F8 -no upgrades using CDs.
--
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
http://www.kanarip.com/
RHCE, LPIC-2, MCP, CCNA
C6B0 7FB4 43E6 CDDA D258 F70B 28DE 9FDA 9342 BF08
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
