Hi,
On 10/18/07, Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Caolan,
>
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-ar - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-hebrew
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-ur - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> >> tetex-fonts-hebrew - 0.1-7.fc6.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
> >
> > So is this just some sort of bug in the fonts-arabic/fonts-hebrew
> > meta-packages or do all the above requiring packages need to be fixed to
> > require the differently named packages.
>
> It seems fonts-arabic and fonts-hebrew were not in rawhide-20071017
> for some reason - dunno why. They have been updated for the new fonts
> packages (along with fonts-sinhala) so assuming they come back
> everything ought to be ok.
I found %files section missing in all 3 packages. Rahul has built
them now (guess it happened while making them as meta-package). So
this dependency problem will get resolved in tomorrow's rawhide->
20071019.
Thanks,
parag.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
