On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 22:34 -0400, Build System wrote: > New package culmus-fonts > Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project > > New package kacst-fonts > Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project > > fonts-arabic-2.1-1.fc8 > ---------------------- > * Wed Oct 17 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.1-1.fc8 > - This package is now metapackage since kacst and paktype fonts have been moved to their separate packages > > fonts-hebrew-0.101-1.fc8 > ------------------------ > * Wed Oct 17 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@xxxxxxxxxx> - 0.101-1.fc8 > - This is now a metapackage since Culmus fonts were moved to a separate package > openoffice.org-langpack-ar - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic > openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-hebrew > openoffice.org-langpack-ur - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic > tetex-fonts-hebrew - 0.1-7.fc6.noarch requires fonts-hebrew So is this just some sort of bug in the fonts-arabic/fonts-hebrew meta-packages or do all the above requiring packages need to be fixed to require the differently named packages. C. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
