Le jeudi 18 octobre 2007 à 10:16 +0300, Panu Matilainen a écrit : > Amen. If the labels were universally set in stone, it might make sense to > store into rpm but as they can and do vary between policy versions, > different policies and local custom policies... You could make the same arguments for user names, unix permissions or file location — a lot them have different values in the wild than in Fedora and yet we store our policy in rpm. It all goes down to whether we want to make selinux a first-class citizen, provide good selinux support by default, and make Fedora policy choices, or keep it in the current netherworld where most Fedora packagers do not feel concerned and users learn to add selinux=false to their grub config. There is no middle ground. Middle ground is just a way to avoid fixing problems, confuses people and makes them avoid the thing like the plague. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
