Re: Request for Comments: Proposed changes to Fedora development cycle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 19:13 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 16.10.2007 16:24, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Please read through 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/DevelopmentChangesProposal
> > and follow up on this thread with any questions comments. [...]
> 
> In general: looks nice, some steps in the right direction IMHO. But not
> enough IMHO. Quoted some parts of the proposal below, some other ideas
> and the end of the mail:
> 
> > = Proposed Development Process Changes for Fedora 9 =
> > [...]
> > == Proposed Solution ==
> > Move to an Alpha/Beta/RC/Final release method.
> 
> Hmmm, even after reading the proposal three times now it got a bit of an
> "use different names for what we had already with some small
> modifications" feeling

The different names should give an indication that we want to treat the
various snapshots differently. The uniform test1/test2/test3 naming
scheme doesn't really get that point across.



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux