Op zondag 14-10-2007 om 13:45 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Dennis Gilmore: > Once upon a time Sunday 14 October 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > When the fpc-package (Freepascal compiler) was approved, there were no > > rules regarding pre-build binaries and compilers yet. But after some > > discussion I got an approval to use them. > > > > Now I want to add support for ppc64 but to do that, I need to use a > > pre-build binary once more. The current packaging-guidelines state that > > I need an approval from the packaging committee. > > > > So what should I do now, ask for an approval or isn't that necessary? > I think that since you initially got approval to use the prebuilt binary to > bootstrap fpc that it should be ok. What i would suggest though is putting > the logic in the spec permanently to bootstrap other archs and have a > defines control that. Once you have a build that has been bootstrapped. > build a new version that is built against the fedora built fpc package. I deliberately removed all the prebuilt-binary stuff from the spec-file after the first release. But maybe you're right. I can add it with a define. That could be usefull in the future. Joost -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
