Re: Freepascal compiler inclusion of pre-build binary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time Sunday 14 October 2007, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When the fpc-package (Freepascal compiler) was approved, there were no
> rules regarding pre-build binaries and compilers yet. But after some
> discussion I got an approval to use them.
>
> Now I want to add support for ppc64 but to do that, I need to use a
> pre-build binary once more. The current packaging-guidelines state that
> I need an approval from the packaging committee.
>
> So what should I do now, ask for an approval or isn't that necessary?
I think that since you initially got approval to use the prebuilt binary  to 
bootstrap fpc  that it should be ok.  What i would suggest though is putting 
the logic in the spec permanently to bootstrap other archs  and have a 
defines control that.  Once you have a build that has been bootstrapped.  
build a new version that is built against the fedora built fpc package.

Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux