On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 22:33 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > I think that is wrong and a little short-sighted. It really should be > mount.ntfs-3g - the kernel driver was implemented first - it is still > under development and may well be released around the time of F9+1. > Speed issues alone will support the use of kernel filesystems over > userspace ones and this will simply prompt a return to this debate. > Please can this be changed. Anton's been promising that driver for two+ years now. If it ever emerges, I'd be willing to revisit my opinion on this matter. As to performance, can you back up your assertions with statistics? Something like: http://ntfs-3g.org/performance.html ~spot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list