On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:46:13PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > One detail: The "GPLv2 or any later version" clause is inacceptable to > several project and probably is incompatible and/or void in some legal > systems (In Germany, it is controversial). I'm not aware of any issues there. Its very different from the usual "and we may change the licence on you" clauses - which have been found unreasonable in assorted jurisdictions because you the end user make the choice, not the supplier. Alan -- "Where small clearances exist, controls are required to prevent these clearances becoming negative" - How a rail standards body describes "not hitting a wall" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
