Re: samba license change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> I prefer to rely on existing precedences which had been approved by
> courts, and not a political party's wishful thinking.

Then you never change licenses? Somebody have to take the risk to
release software under the new license in order to have it challenged in
court. It is logical that those who need the new features of the license
(the samba team) takes the risk. Those who don't want to take the risk
have to rewrite the software under whatever license they prefer. They
have to be solidary because they use the work of those who want the new
license.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux